Huja

In his 33 years as head of Community development in Charlottesville Huja made vast improvements in the quality of life in the Woolen Mills Neighborhood. His work in preservation helped maintain the fabric of our community. His vision to introduce citizens to the Rivanna River recreationally via a trail and park has been transformative. His traffic calming actions made walking safer. He was good to us.

Huja wasn’t afraid of the 4 way stop. That signage put an end to drag racing on Chesapeake and Market.
Signage isn’t foolproof.
http://historicwoolenmills.org/fabric/2025/02/19/signage/

Happy Valentines Day!

Roses in February in the Northern Hemisphere, particularly around Valentine’s Day, often come with significant environmental costs due to the region’s cold climate and the need for importation or energy-intensive cultivation. Here’s a breakdown:
Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Importation:
Most roses available in February are imported from warmer regions like South America (e.g., Ecuador, Colombia) or Africa (e.g., Kenya).
Air freight, the fastest way to transport fresh flowers, generates high carbon emissions. For example, flying roses from Colombia to the U.S. can produce up to 3-4 kg of CO2 per dozen roses, depending on the distance and transport method.
Refrigerated storage and shipping (to maintain freshness) further increase energy use.
Energy-Intensive Greenhouse Production:
If grown locally in the Northern Hemisphere, roses require heated greenhouses due to cold winter temperatures.
Heating greenhouses with fossil fuels (e.g., natural gas, oil) emits significant CO2. For instance, producing a dozen roses in a Dutch greenhouse can emit 2-3 kg of CO2 if heated conventionally.
Artificial lighting to mimic longer daylight hours also adds to energy consumption.
Water and Pesticide Use:
Rose cultivation, especially in large-scale farms, is water-intensive. In water-scarce regions like parts of Kenya, this can strain local water supplies.
Pesticides and fertilizers used to grow perfect, pest-free roses can contaminate soil and waterways, harming ecosystems and local biodiversity.
Packaging and Waste:
Roses are often wrapped in plastic sleeves, packed in cardboard, and shipped with cooling materials, contributing to waste.
Much of this packaging is single-use and not biodegradable, adding to landfill burdens.
Land Use and Deforestation:
Expanding flower farms in exporting countries can lead to deforestation or conversion of agricultural land, reducing habitats for wildlife and affecting local food production.
Social and Environmental Trade-Offs:
While flower farms provide jobs, the environmental costs (e.g., water depletion, pesticide exposure) often disproportionately affect local communities in producing countries.
Mitigation Options:
Buy Locally or Seasonally: Opt for locally grown, seasonal flowers when possible, though options are limited in February.
Choose Certified Roses: Look for certifications like Fair Trade or Rainforest Alliance, which promote more sustainable practices.
Reduce Demand for Perfection: Accepting minor imperfections can reduce pesticide and energy use.
Consider Alternatives: Potted plants or dried flowers have lower environmental impacts.
In summary, the environmental costs of February roses in the Northern Hemisphere are primarily tied to high-emission transportation, energy-intensive greenhouse production, and resource use in cultivation, with broader ecological and social impacts in producing regions.–Grok